How change name of level (All)

Hi,
I’m creating dimension with SSAS 2005 – Business Intelligence Development
Studio. Dimension has attribute hierarchies and user hierarchies.
For attribute hierarchies and user hierarchies I can define my own all
member name ( property AttributeAllMemberName for attribute hierarchies and
property AllMemberName for user hierarchies). But I can’t find a place where
I could change the name of all level. It’s name is now “(All)”. But I need
to change it. How can I do it with AMO or with BI Development studio? Please
help me.
Thanks for the answer
Dorota
you can't rename it
you want to change it to which value?
"Dorota Papiernik" <DorotaPapiernik@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:1B0E4BDC-BD75-4483-AB51-24F7747C87FF@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I’m creating dimension with SSAS 2005 – Business Intelligence Development
> Studio. Dimension has attribute hierarchies and user hierarchies.
> For attribute hierarchies and user hierarchies I can define my own all
> member name ( property AttributeAllMemberName for attribute hierarchies
> and
> property AllMemberName for user hierarchies). But I can’t find a place
> where
> I could change the name of all level. It’s name is now “(All)”. But I
> need
> to change it. How can I do it with AMO or with BI Development studio?
> Please
> help me.
> Thanks for the answer
> Dorota
>
|||Hi,
Thank you very much for the answer. I’d like to rename it to polish name,
for example instead of “(All)” I need “Calosc”.
Thanks for the help.
Dorota Papiernik
"Jeje" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> you can't rename it
> you want to change it to which value?
> "Dorota Papiernik" <DorotaPapiernik@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:1B0E4BDC-BD75-4483-AB51-24F7747C87FF@.microsoft.com...
|||well...
in fact it's never used, and the end user generally never use (All) level
directly.
the end user use the all member name you defined.
I know that few applications display "(All)" in the interface.
But it's not possible to change it today.
Log your request in the connect website as an improvment.
"Dorota Papiernik" <DorotaPapiernik@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:7F16FE08-B741-4148-93B4-C802467735BF@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi,
> Thank you very much for the answer. I’d like to rename it to polish name,
> for example instead of “(All)” I need “Calosc”.
> Thanks for the help.
> Dorota Papiernik
>
> "Jeje" wrote:
|||Hi,
In Analysis Services 2000 it was possible to change name of the level (All).
So for polish users I changed it to polish value “Calosc”. I have migrated
database of my customer to Analysis Services 2005, and I have expected that
on Analysis Services 2005 I also can change name of level (All). Now I see it
is not possible. So polish users will have to work with the name “(All)”.
Thank for help and for information once more. As you suggested, I’m going
to log my request in the connect website.
Dorota Papiernik
"Jeje" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> well...
> in fact it's never used, and the end user generally never use (All) level
> directly.
> the end user use the all member name you defined.
> I know that few applications display "(All)" in the interface.
> But it's not possible to change it today.
> Log your request in the connect website as an improvment.
>
> "Dorota Papiernik" <DorotaPapiernik@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:7F16FE08-B741-4148-93B4-C802467735BF@.microsoft.com...

How can I test if Time-intelligence and its time periods for data calculation over periods are r

Hi, all experts here,

How could we test if the time intelligence and its time periods for data calculation over periods are recognized by the server and working properly? As though I implemented the time intelligence and defined the time periods for it, and it is processed successfully. But how could we actually see the testing results of these time intelligence and its data?

Hope my question is clear for your help.

I am looking forward to hearing from you shortly.

Thanks a lot.

With best regards,

Yours sincerely,

Maybe you could read this article and then try to see how the wizard modified your solution and come up with verification?

http://www.sqlmag.com/articles/index.cfm?articleid=46157&

|||

Hi, Andrew,

Thanks a lot for your help.

With best regards,

Yours sincerely,